Multinational Corporations are proposing to bring back money they hid offshore on their terms. The very rich and few want to dictate policy in the US. Google "2011 us corporate tax holiday". Google, Microsoft, Pfizer, Apple, Adobe. They want no conditions on how the money is used, and they want a 5% tax rate. FIVE. NOT A TYPO.
Here is a description of one of the tools being used by US corporations to legally avoid paying taxes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Irish_Arrangement
OK, so based on this, Ireland must be swimming in cash, right? Nope. Why is that Ireland, despite their 12% corporate tax rate, which is the lowest in the world on the books, has a public debt as bad as the USA with respect to GDP, a ratio that is QUICKLY growing? Doesn't seem like the 12% rate is good for Ireland. Note: in the US, the effective corporate tax rate is already below 20% because of this.
Ireland debt graph:
http://www.ntma.ie/NationalDebt/debtGDP.php
Here is what the treasury has to say. Basically, last time we did this in 2004, the multinational recipients got most of the benefit [not too many small businesses are overseas] and still cut jobs. The rich got richer. Again.
http://www.treasury.gov/connect/blog/Pages/Just-the-Facts-The-Costs-of-a-Repatriation-Tax-Holiday.aspx
Does any SANE person think that these companies won't leave Ireland [or the US again] if some shell nation enacts a 2.5% effective corporate tax rate? All of the same arguments apply to our current situation. "We do what makes sense to the shareholders ... It would be 'stupid' to not do so."
These above quotes [and more] sourced from a transcript from last Sunday's 60 minutes.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/03/25/60minutes/main20046867.shtml
While I'm add it, I'll tick off a list of other things that must be stupid. Paying living wages. Providing healthcare. Protecting the enviornment. Educating our children. Eating healthy food. Drinking clean water. Are these things the "shareholders" don't care about? I'm a shareholder, and I care about these things.
Want to know what else is stupid? Thinking a revolution isn't coming. I think a growing number of people are finally admitting that corporate 'freedom' is economic terrorism.
Want to get into an argument about how --I'm-- unpatriotic because I'm liberal, or I --must-- be a communist? American multinational corporations value shareholders more than America. They say it themselves. Wake up America, there are almost 2.5 BILLION people in India and China, already slaves and potentially consumers to a wealthy elite. Corporations no longer need America.
Without global reform and current consumption patterns we are heading towards a race to the bottom, a corporate global oligarchy where that will kill either America or capitalism.
Really, how do we get out of this mess? We need to start taking care of ourselves by taking care of our families and communities.
Good luck.
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Friday, March 25, 2011
Fitzwalkerstan Water LLC: Now with electrolytes!
This is not proposed yet, but let me be the first to say "I told you so" when it happens.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_privatization
Globally, more than 90% of water and sanitation systems are publicly owned and operated. The privatization of the water industry is already trillion dollar industry. Think bottled water. Prepare to pay more for less to a private monopoly that puts profit over service. Past and current water privatization proposals have even denied peoples' rights to collect rain water on their property.
Why do I think this could happen? The ALEC "State Budget Toolkit" promotes privitization of water services [and other things like state parks and roads].
http://www.alec.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=State_Budget_Reform_Toolkit&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=15218
PS: Sorry for the delay. To say I'm running out of steam would be an exaggeration; I just can't keep up at the previous pace.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_privatization
Globally, more than 90% of water and sanitation systems are publicly owned and operated. The privatization of the water industry is already trillion dollar industry. Think bottled water. Prepare to pay more for less to a private monopoly that puts profit over service. Past and current water privatization proposals have even denied peoples' rights to collect rain water on their property.
Why do I think this could happen? The ALEC "State Budget Toolkit" promotes privitization of water services [and other things like state parks and roads].
http://www.alec.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=State_Budget_Reform_Toolkit&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=15218
PS: Sorry for the delay. To say I'm running out of steam would be an exaggeration; I just can't keep up at the previous pace.
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
I Don't Already Have the Right to Vote?
The more you pay attention, the more messed up you realize things are in America.
At the Capitol last Saturday, I was talking to a lady that heard a 'rumor' that part of the end game of this latest conservative political movement was to abolish elections. It's far fetched, but it's not inconceivable. The U.S. is one of just 11 among 120 or so constitutional democracies that fail to guarantee a right to vote in their constitutions.
The actions of some of the current Republican majority seem to indicate they'd certainly salivate over the idea of, at a minimum, heavily clamping down on who can vote based on ideology. This is of course ignoring what already happens with 'legal' gerrymandering [both parties guilty of this]
In fact, I'll go further. I'll buy you a beer* if, by 2012, at least one conservative majority state hasn't tried to severely restrict the right to suffrage based on their expected idelogical outcome.
PS, I'm not for sure voting for Obama, but I'm not seeing a good reason to trust conservatives either.
Further reading;
http://movetoamend.org/frequently-asked-questions-0#anchor-three
* a three way handshake must occur for this offer to be valid.
At the Capitol last Saturday, I was talking to a lady that heard a 'rumor' that part of the end game of this latest conservative political movement was to abolish elections. It's far fetched, but it's not inconceivable. The U.S. is one of just 11 among 120 or so constitutional democracies that fail to guarantee a right to vote in their constitutions.
The actions of some of the current Republican majority seem to indicate they'd certainly salivate over the idea of, at a minimum, heavily clamping down on who can vote based on ideology. This is of course ignoring what already happens with 'legal' gerrymandering [both parties guilty of this]
In fact, I'll go further. I'll buy you a beer* if, by 2012, at least one conservative majority state hasn't tried to severely restrict the right to suffrage based on their expected idelogical outcome.
PS, I'm not for sure voting for Obama, but I'm not seeing a good reason to trust conservatives either.
Further reading;
http://movetoamend.org/frequently-asked-questions-0#anchor-three
* a three way handshake must occur for this offer to be valid.
Monday, March 21, 2011
Dunkelweizen is Patriotic
I'm thinking of moving to Germany. Here are my reasons in order.
1) The Beer
2) The Voter Turnout
3) Not a two party system
4) The Beer
5) The Pirate Party got more votes than the Republican Party [yes, I know of the "National Democratic Party"...]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Germany
Pirate Party Platform: I'd probably be branded an enemy of the state or a lunatic if I ran on this here.
"The party opposes the dismantlement of civil rights in telephony and on the Internet, in particular the European data retention policies and Germany's new Internet censorship law called Zugangserschwerungsgesetz. It also opposes artificial monopolies and various measures of surveillance of citizens. The party favors the civil right to information privacy and reforms of copyright, education, computer science and genetic patents. It promotes in particular an enhanced transparency of government by implementing open source governance and providing for APIs to allow for electronic inspection and control of government operations by the citizen."
I don't think the Pirate Party would stand for this:
http://www.savetheinternet.com/faq
1) The Beer
2) The Voter Turnout
3) Not a two party system
4) The Beer
5) The Pirate Party got more votes than the Republican Party [yes, I know of the "National Democratic Party"...]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Germany
Pirate Party Platform: I'd probably be branded an enemy of the state or a lunatic if I ran on this here.
"The party opposes the dismantlement of civil rights in telephony and on the Internet, in particular the European data retention policies and Germany's new Internet censorship law called Zugangserschwerungsgesetz. It also opposes artificial monopolies and various measures of surveillance of citizens. The party favors the civil right to information privacy and reforms of copyright, education, computer science and genetic patents. It promotes in particular an enhanced transparency of government by implementing open source governance and providing for APIs to allow for electronic inspection and control of government operations by the citizen."
I don't think the Pirate Party would stand for this:
http://www.savetheinternet.com/faq
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Money is NOT speech
A constitutional amendment is required to overturn Citizens United vs F.E.C.
This isn't just a liberal issue. There are many in the tea party movement that agree.
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/02/some_tea_partiers_are_expressing.php
The first step is a referendum in your local muncipialties to send a clear signal to Washington that the people of this country need to fund political campaigns. In Madison, Dane County is having an advisory referendum in April in an effort to overturn Citizens United vs FEC.
http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/elections/article_870ba84a-07e1-11e0-8a3d-001cc4c03286.html
Dane County Executive candidate Eileen Bruskewitz sides with the court decision. In her words, "In this country, speech depends on money, so inhibiting that speech is not a good idea". Eileen; speech does NOT depend on money, and free speech is NOT only for those who have money. Maybe you hasn't noticed how easy it is [currently] to speak and organize on the internet. Is that really what you want people to believe, that people don't have a voice unless they have money, and the voice with money is the right voice?
What's next? Should we charge $10000 to vote? How about $10000 for each candidate a person wants to vote for? Hell with that, how about $10000 per vote, unlimited?
Eileen's position is a shameful position to take. I almost expect conservatives to tackle free speech on the internet if they remain in majority. Enjoy reading my blog while free speech remains.
Consider joining movetoamend.org to end the abuse of money in politics. Write your legislators and demand a referendum in your city, county and state.
http://movetoamend.org/
The people in this country, liberals, conservatives, and everyone in between [and on the fringes] should have an equal opportunity to be involved in the dialogue of how this country is run. Not just the rich. We the people made the rich what they are today. We the people build America.
PS, Abraham Lincoln, as a Republican, once fled debate to evade quorum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
History of this ruling, in the event that it is news to you. There is simply too much in money in politics all around. This is a bipartisian issue.
Thanks to the Citizens United ruling in 2010, nearly $4 Billion was spent on the 2010 midterm elections. This is more than the GDP of several countries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28nominal%29
It is also less than one-third of the $13.4 billion in profits that investment bank Goldman Sachs saw in 2009
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/21/AR2010012101044.html
In short, a $4 billion investment is a drop in the bucket compared to how much power and influence you have over the U.S. when in office on either side the political spectrum.
The Citizens United vs FEC ruling opened the gates to the creation of undisclosed donor super PACs, sometimes funded by one or a small number of individuals with names that misled individuals to think that they these groups are representing large groups of individuals. This money doesn't even need to come from within the U.S, which is a travesty. Both liberals and conservatives are guilty of this, however, conservatives are -more- guilty.
This isn't just a liberal issue. There are many in the tea party movement that agree.
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/02/some_tea_partiers_are_expressing.php
The first step is a referendum in your local muncipialties to send a clear signal to Washington that the people of this country need to fund political campaigns. In Madison, Dane County is having an advisory referendum in April in an effort to overturn Citizens United vs FEC.
http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/local/govt-and-politics/elections/article_870ba84a-07e1-11e0-8a3d-001cc4c03286.html
Dane County Executive candidate Eileen Bruskewitz sides with the court decision. In her words, "In this country, speech depends on money, so inhibiting that speech is not a good idea". Eileen; speech does NOT depend on money, and free speech is NOT only for those who have money. Maybe you hasn't noticed how easy it is [currently] to speak and organize on the internet. Is that really what you want people to believe, that people don't have a voice unless they have money, and the voice with money is the right voice?
What's next? Should we charge $10000 to vote? How about $10000 for each candidate a person wants to vote for? Hell with that, how about $10000 per vote, unlimited?
Eileen's position is a shameful position to take. I almost expect conservatives to tackle free speech on the internet if they remain in majority. Enjoy reading my blog while free speech remains.
Consider joining movetoamend.org to end the abuse of money in politics. Write your legislators and demand a referendum in your city, county and state.
http://movetoamend.org/
The people in this country, liberals, conservatives, and everyone in between [and on the fringes] should have an equal opportunity to be involved in the dialogue of how this country is run. Not just the rich. We the people made the rich what they are today. We the people build America.
PS, Abraham Lincoln, as a Republican, once fled debate to evade quorum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
History of this ruling, in the event that it is news to you. There is simply too much in money in politics all around. This is a bipartisian issue.
Thanks to the Citizens United ruling in 2010, nearly $4 Billion was spent on the 2010 midterm elections. This is more than the GDP of several countries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28nominal%29
It is also less than one-third of the $13.4 billion in profits that investment bank Goldman Sachs saw in 2009
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/21/AR2010012101044.html
In short, a $4 billion investment is a drop in the bucket compared to how much power and influence you have over the U.S. when in office on either side the political spectrum.
The Citizens United vs FEC ruling opened the gates to the creation of undisclosed donor super PACs, sometimes funded by one or a small number of individuals with names that misled individuals to think that they these groups are representing large groups of individuals. This money doesn't even need to come from within the U.S, which is a travesty. Both liberals and conservatives are guilty of this, however, conservatives are -more- guilty.
Friday, March 18, 2011
ALEC State Budget Reform Toolkit
Mega summary: Enjoy paying a dime each time you back out of your driveway or turn on your tap, because I believe ultimately Walker may push to privatize state parks, water services, and public roads.
link:
http://www.alec.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=State_Budget_Reform_Toolkit&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=15218
pdf:
http://www.alec.org/am/pdf/tax/Budget_toolkit.pdf
summary:
"Today, states face structural deficits created by overspending. Most of the legislative “fixes” over the past few years for state budget gaps have merely postponed or obscured the problems rather than addressing them directly. ALEC's State Budget Reform Toolkit will advance a set of budget and procurement best practices to guide state policymakers as they work to solve the current budget shortfalls, assisting legislators in prioritizing and more efficiently delivering core government services through advancing Jeffersonian principles of free markets, limited government, federalism, and individual liberty."
Remember, this series to meant to expose "What's next" with respect to sweeping Conservative legislation being mirrored throughout US States.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130891396
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
page 5, an outline of this document.
Seems like in Wisconsin we conveniently skipped over 'Tools to Modernize State Budgeting' and 'Tools to Improve Budget Transparency' and skipped right to 'Tools to Control Costs and Improve Government Efficiency'. I believe bypassing 'Tools to Improve Budget Transparency' was critical in bringing in 100,000 protestors.
page 6;
me> I agree with the nearly all aspects of the introduction, but I think balancing the federal budget, and therefore state budget, while ignoring the negative aspects of globalization is short sighted
page 7; Introduces 'Priority-based budgeting', which they claim means state officials and citizens must first determine the core functions of government.
me> The problem is that 'citizens' are being left out of the discussion as mandates are laid down! The budget has already been decided, there will be no critical changes. "We're Broke" is the most articulate our Governor has been. That is not leading, that is following a think tank.
page 15: State—Priorities of Government Budgeting Model; example from Washington.
Applied to Wisconsin, it's clear Walker's budget is not prioritized properly.
* Improve student achievement in elementary, middle, and high schools.
> We hear about revenue cuts and 'tools' needed to deal with it [layoffs and reduction of benefits], but how will this improve student achievement?
* Improve the value of postsecondary learning.
> How does cutting money and making the school less accessible improve 'value'?
* Improve the health of [state] citizens.
> We hear about cuts to Medicaid and loosening of enviornmental regulations. Walker's budget proposal also includes rolling back funding support for the Wisconsin local food movement. How does this improve the health of Wisconsin citizens?
* Improve the security of [the state's] vulnerable children and adults.
> How does cutting funding to badgercare produce this? In Michigan's case, how does removing a tax credit on pensions do this?
* Improve the quality of [the states] natural resources.
> How does eliminating clean water and recycling programs do this? How does providing tax incentives for wetland development promote this?
page 18> How can one promote an item reduction veto policy yet promote budget transparency?? In Wisconsin the Governor can veto individual letters or numbers in legislation to make a new law. The Frankstein vote is terrible and needs to removed ASAP, not congratulated. Again, -shame- on Doyle for not getting rid of this monster.
page 21b> To help facilitate public involvement, legislators should adopt a 72-hour timeout period once a tax or spending bill is introduced or amended, and before hearings or legislative votes occur.
me> Yet in states across our nation including Wisconsin and Utah, Conservative majorites either have attempted or have succesfully rammed through legislation is less than 24 hours!
page 23> beginning of the cost control options. Let's see what has been enacted and what things are left out.
1) Freeze state hiring: done
2) Reform state pensions: proposed/in progress
I believe there is an entire document on this that I will look at later. Remember; the ETF is well funded.
*capping off the existing pension system and forming a defined-contribution system for all new employees.
- pension will likely be turned into a voluntary 401k
* State policymakers can also consider capping off pension ballooning in state employees’ final years of service.
me> Yes, I agree this one should be done
3) Restructure State Retiree Health Care Plans; I looked at that here:
http://mdhare.blogspot.com/2011/03/shoulda-took-and-ran-like-steve-miller.html
4) Eliminate Positions Vacant More Than Six Months: not yet proposed as far as I know, maybe it is
5) Delay Automatic Pay Increases [Done: linked to a -maximum- of inflation, in fact, one could argue that the legislation mandates our pay to go down when adjusted to inflation from this point moving forward]
..
skipped a few here
..
6) Embrace the Expanded Use of Privatization and Competitive Contracting. Oh boy, just wait until you see how 250,000 private sector jobs are created by destroying public sector ones. A race to see who can offer their employees the least pay to reach the lowest bid contacts, hurrah! Here are a list of things recommended for privitization
* Highway design and maintenance. [appalling, physical mobility is still -the- basis to our economy]
* Building repair and maintenance.
* Vehicle fleet operations, maintenance, and ownership.
* Information technology [ usually fails hard, I work in this industry]
* Administrative support services (e.g., HR, payroll,accounting, mail, printing, etc.).
* Risk management (e.g., claims processing, loss prevention services).
* Facilities financing, operations, and maintenance.
* Park operations and maintenance. [good god]
# this one is in progress
* Corrections and mental health (facility operations and management; health care, medical and food services).
# I joked about this, but the privitization of any of the below services is a kick to the face for a society
* Core infrastructure (roads/transit, water, etc.).
* Engineering services.
* Welfare-to-work programs.
# in progress
* Child care, child welfare, and adoption programs.
# in progress
* Juvenile rehabilitation.
# And lately, because getting the answer you want to hear is always better than the answer you should hear.
* Environmental lab analysis.
7) Establish a State Privatization and Efficiency Council
> in progress/done, given the privitazation of the department of commerce. Expect the newly formed agency to reward privatization contracts on major municipal services to carry out the above list.
Expect multi million dollar taxpayer grants to privitize delivery of our water. Do you expect impartial water quality reports on contaminents from a private lab analysis company from a private water service company who, by definition of unregulated capitalism, puts quarterly profit above all else?
8) Create a Statewide Real Property Inventory and Search the Balance Sheet for Asset Sale and Lease Opportunities
me> in progress [power plants, etc]
So, the big kicker I see coming next is wait until you see what Walker attempts to privatize. The list will likely include
1) Our State Parks
2) Our water services
3) Our public roads
I'm sorry, but that's just way too far. I can't wait to vacation to "Devil's Lake State Park, a divison of Koch Industries", pay a $15 highway fee to get there, another fee to walk on the bluffs and pay $2/pint for water to drink while there.
More on water services in my next post.
Mega summary: Enjoy paying a dime each time you back out of your driveway or turn on your tap, because I believe ultimately Walker may push to privatize state parks, water services, and public roads.
link:
http://www.alec.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=State_Budget_Reform_Toolkit&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=15218
pdf:
http://www.alec.org/am/pdf/tax/Budget_toolkit.pdf
summary:
"Today, states face structural deficits created by overspending. Most of the legislative “fixes” over the past few years for state budget gaps have merely postponed or obscured the problems rather than addressing them directly. ALEC's State Budget Reform Toolkit will advance a set of budget and procurement best practices to guide state policymakers as they work to solve the current budget shortfalls, assisting legislators in prioritizing and more efficiently delivering core government services through advancing Jeffersonian principles of free markets, limited government, federalism, and individual liberty."
Remember, this series to meant to expose "What's next" with respect to sweeping Conservative legislation being mirrored throughout US States.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130891396
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
page 5, an outline of this document.
Seems like in Wisconsin we conveniently skipped over 'Tools to Modernize State Budgeting' and 'Tools to Improve Budget Transparency' and skipped right to 'Tools to Control Costs and Improve Government Efficiency'. I believe bypassing 'Tools to Improve Budget Transparency' was critical in bringing in 100,000 protestors.
page 6;
me> I agree with the nearly all aspects of the introduction, but I think balancing the federal budget, and therefore state budget, while ignoring the negative aspects of globalization is short sighted
page 7; Introduces 'Priority-based budgeting', which they claim means state officials and citizens must first determine the core functions of government.
me> The problem is that 'citizens' are being left out of the discussion as mandates are laid down! The budget has already been decided, there will be no critical changes. "We're Broke" is the most articulate our Governor has been. That is not leading, that is following a think tank.
page 15: State—Priorities of Government Budgeting Model; example from Washington.
Applied to Wisconsin, it's clear Walker's budget is not prioritized properly.
* Improve student achievement in elementary, middle, and high schools.
> We hear about revenue cuts and 'tools' needed to deal with it [layoffs and reduction of benefits], but how will this improve student achievement?
* Improve the value of postsecondary learning.
> How does cutting money and making the school less accessible improve 'value'?
* Improve the health of [state] citizens.
> We hear about cuts to Medicaid and loosening of enviornmental regulations. Walker's budget proposal also includes rolling back funding support for the Wisconsin local food movement. How does this improve the health of Wisconsin citizens?
* Improve the security of [the state's] vulnerable children and adults.
> How does cutting funding to badgercare produce this? In Michigan's case, how does removing a tax credit on pensions do this?
* Improve the quality of [the states] natural resources.
> How does eliminating clean water and recycling programs do this? How does providing tax incentives for wetland development promote this?
page 18> How can one promote an item reduction veto policy yet promote budget transparency?? In Wisconsin the Governor can veto individual letters or numbers in legislation to make a new law. The Frankstein vote is terrible and needs to removed ASAP, not congratulated. Again, -shame- on Doyle for not getting rid of this monster.
page 21b> To help facilitate public involvement, legislators should adopt a 72-hour timeout period once a tax or spending bill is introduced or amended, and before hearings or legislative votes occur.
me> Yet in states across our nation including Wisconsin and Utah, Conservative majorites either have attempted or have succesfully rammed through legislation is less than 24 hours!
page 23> beginning of the cost control options. Let's see what has been enacted and what things are left out.
1) Freeze state hiring: done
2) Reform state pensions: proposed/in progress
I believe there is an entire document on this that I will look at later. Remember; the ETF is well funded.
*capping off the existing pension system and forming a defined-contribution system for all new employees.
- pension will likely be turned into a voluntary 401k
* State policymakers can also consider capping off pension ballooning in state employees’ final years of service.
me> Yes, I agree this one should be done
3) Restructure State Retiree Health Care Plans; I looked at that here:
http://mdhare.blogspot.com/2011/03/shoulda-took-and-ran-like-steve-miller.html
4) Eliminate Positions Vacant More Than Six Months: not yet proposed as far as I know, maybe it is
5) Delay Automatic Pay Increases [Done: linked to a -maximum- of inflation, in fact, one could argue that the legislation mandates our pay to go down when adjusted to inflation from this point moving forward]
..
skipped a few here
..
6) Embrace the Expanded Use of Privatization and Competitive Contracting. Oh boy, just wait until you see how 250,000 private sector jobs are created by destroying public sector ones. A race to see who can offer their employees the least pay to reach the lowest bid contacts, hurrah! Here are a list of things recommended for privitization
* Highway design and maintenance. [appalling, physical mobility is still -the- basis to our economy]
* Building repair and maintenance.
* Vehicle fleet operations, maintenance, and ownership.
* Information technology [ usually fails hard, I work in this industry]
* Administrative support services (e.g., HR, payroll,accounting, mail, printing, etc.).
* Risk management (e.g., claims processing, loss prevention services).
* Facilities financing, operations, and maintenance.
* Park operations and maintenance. [good god]
# this one is in progress
* Corrections and mental health (facility operations and management; health care, medical and food services).
# I joked about this, but the privitization of any of the below services is a kick to the face for a society
* Core infrastructure (roads/transit, water, etc.).
* Engineering services.
* Welfare-to-work programs.
# in progress
* Child care, child welfare, and adoption programs.
# in progress
* Juvenile rehabilitation.
# And lately, because getting the answer you want to hear is always better than the answer you should hear.
* Environmental lab analysis.
7) Establish a State Privatization and Efficiency Council
> in progress/done, given the privitazation of the department of commerce. Expect the newly formed agency to reward privatization contracts on major municipal services to carry out the above list.
Expect multi million dollar taxpayer grants to privitize delivery of our water. Do you expect impartial water quality reports on contaminents from a private lab analysis company from a private water service company who, by definition of unregulated capitalism, puts quarterly profit above all else?
8) Create a Statewide Real Property Inventory and Search the Balance Sheet for Asset Sale and Lease Opportunities
me> in progress [power plants, etc]
So, the big kicker I see coming next is wait until you see what Walker attempts to privatize. The list will likely include
1) Our State Parks
2) Our water services
3) Our public roads
I'm sorry, but that's just way too far. I can't wait to vacation to "Devil's Lake State Park, a divison of Koch Industries", pay a $15 highway fee to get there, another fee to walk on the bluffs and pay $2/pint for water to drink while there.
More on water services in my next post.
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Primary education is NOT a business
There is ample evidence that Walker is putting in place plans for privatization of public education well beyond what is in the budget proposal or what he is caring to admit publicly yet.
The budget proposal covers semi-privatization of UW-Madison [and possibly UW-Milwaukee in the future]. The budget proposal plans to remove Charter school caps in MPS, which is likely to have a negative impact on MPS.
Also note that the budget proposal states that a teacher at a charter school doesn't have to be a teacher certified via DPI, just someone with a bachelors degree. While this may not be cataclysmic, it isn't necessarily great, either, as we should demand some sort of uniformity in our teachers capabilities, much like we test our children with standardized tests.
Have a look yourself at the following proposed legislation:
Senate Bill 20 allows parts of MPS to be sold for property tax relief
http://legis.wisconsin.gov/2011/data/SB-20.pdf
However, Senate Bill 22 goes further.
http://legis.wisconsin.gov/2011/data/SB-22.pdf
Senate Bill 22 includes unlimited Charter school creation, virtual and/or physical with no caps on attendance. When the budget proposal came out I privately suggested to my wife that this would likely reform public education into virtual private schools at a rapid pace. Horrifically, I may have been right.
Combined with Senate Bill 34, which recinds residency requirements for MPS
http://legis.wisconsin.gov/2011/data/SB-34.pdf
It starts to become clear that Walker intends to create some of those 250,000 private sector jobs by eliminating part of public education in the state.
While the residency requirements may be benign, it opens up the possibility that your child's next teacher might not even live in the U.S. Think of all of the money we can save by offshoring education! God bless them, but if you've ever had to talk to off-shore tech support, let's just say there can be, at times, multiple barriers to effective communication.
Throughout all of this, what benchmarks are being done to ensure that the quality of the education system increases, not decreases? Oh that's right, none, because it's all about the money when you run the state like a business. It's all about savings. It's all about "creating an environment where the private sector can create 250,000 [sh***y] jobs". Note: I threw in that part in brackets.
Educating the next generation of Americans is NOT A BUSINESS.
Pass the word. Here are the legislators that introduced the bill. And if you care about the future of Wisconsin and our country, please consider getting involved in the recall processes so we can restore compromise and sanity back into Government.
February 23, 2011 - Introduced by Senators DARLING, OLSEN, LAZICH, VUKMIR,
KAPANKE and GALLOWAY, cosponsored by Representatives VOS, KESTELL,
MARKLEIN, VAN ROY, KLEEFISCH, PRIDEMORE, BIES, NASS, HONADEL, BALLWEG,
KNODL and MURSAU. Referred to Committee on Education.
/////////////////////////// ! BONUS ! ////////////////////////////////////////
Also today, as promised, the 8% [or more] cuts the teachers are facing are just the beginning. Today, Walker urges that "districts and locals can go above and beyond the health care and pension contributions now required of public employees to save money thanks to changes in collective bargaining." to maximize savings.
http://wispolitics.com/1006/110316_Walker_education.mp3
In 2010, the average starting teacher made $34,000 and spent 3% pension on pension and 6% healthcare. Assuming a 'single' healthcare plan, their takehome pay in 2010 was reduced $500 to $33,500. In 2011, under the legislation passed in Senate Bill 11 [50% pension, 12% healthcare] takehome pay is reduced to $31000, a 7.5% pay cut. If the starting teacher needed a family healthcare plan, the takehome pay would be $29500. I am using the cheapest healthcare plan available in these calculations.
Remember, this is average starting pay, not minimum. That works out to be ~$15/hr for a job that requires schooling BEYOND A BACHELORS degree and is directly responsible for preparing the next generation of Americans to be competitive in the private sector.
In 2000 I entered the professional computer field at a starting pay of $43k. I would rank the importance of teachers higher than my job, and ten years later, they make $10k less, not even adjusted for inflation? How do we expect to draw any interest to the noble profession of education like this? What sort of America do we expect to have in 2030?
In summary, in addition to some austerity, can we just tax the rich modestly already so that we don't have to make cuts as draconian as these?
The budget proposal covers semi-privatization of UW-Madison [and possibly UW-Milwaukee in the future]. The budget proposal plans to remove Charter school caps in MPS, which is likely to have a negative impact on MPS.
Also note that the budget proposal states that a teacher at a charter school doesn't have to be a teacher certified via DPI, just someone with a bachelors degree. While this may not be cataclysmic, it isn't necessarily great, either, as we should demand some sort of uniformity in our teachers capabilities, much like we test our children with standardized tests.
Have a look yourself at the following proposed legislation:
Senate Bill 20 allows parts of MPS to be sold for property tax relief
http://legis.wisconsin.gov/2011/data/SB-20.pdf
However, Senate Bill 22 goes further.
http://legis.wisconsin.gov/2011/data/SB-22.pdf
Senate Bill 22 includes unlimited Charter school creation, virtual and/or physical with no caps on attendance. When the budget proposal came out I privately suggested to my wife that this would likely reform public education into virtual private schools at a rapid pace. Horrifically, I may have been right.
Combined with Senate Bill 34, which recinds residency requirements for MPS
http://legis.wisconsin.gov/2011/data/SB-34.pdf
It starts to become clear that Walker intends to create some of those 250,000 private sector jobs by eliminating part of public education in the state.
While the residency requirements may be benign, it opens up the possibility that your child's next teacher might not even live in the U.S. Think of all of the money we can save by offshoring education! God bless them, but if you've ever had to talk to off-shore tech support, let's just say there can be, at times, multiple barriers to effective communication.
Throughout all of this, what benchmarks are being done to ensure that the quality of the education system increases, not decreases? Oh that's right, none, because it's all about the money when you run the state like a business. It's all about savings. It's all about "creating an environment where the private sector can create 250,000 [sh***y] jobs". Note: I threw in that part in brackets.
Educating the next generation of Americans is NOT A BUSINESS.
Pass the word. Here are the legislators that introduced the bill. And if you care about the future of Wisconsin and our country, please consider getting involved in the recall processes so we can restore compromise and sanity back into Government.
February 23, 2011 - Introduced by Senators DARLING, OLSEN, LAZICH, VUKMIR,
KAPANKE and GALLOWAY, cosponsored by Representatives VOS, KESTELL,
MARKLEIN, VAN ROY, KLEEFISCH, PRIDEMORE, BIES, NASS, HONADEL, BALLWEG,
KNODL and MURSAU. Referred to Committee on Education.
/////////////////////////// ! BONUS ! ////////////////////////////////////////
Also today, as promised, the 8% [or more] cuts the teachers are facing are just the beginning. Today, Walker urges that "districts and locals can go above and beyond the health care and pension contributions now required of public employees to save money thanks to changes in collective bargaining." to maximize savings.
http://wispolitics.com/1006/110316_Walker_education.mp3
In 2010, the average starting teacher made $34,000 and spent 3% pension on pension and 6% healthcare. Assuming a 'single' healthcare plan, their takehome pay in 2010 was reduced $500 to $33,500. In 2011, under the legislation passed in Senate Bill 11 [50% pension, 12% healthcare] takehome pay is reduced to $31000, a 7.5% pay cut. If the starting teacher needed a family healthcare plan, the takehome pay would be $29500. I am using the cheapest healthcare plan available in these calculations.
Remember, this is average starting pay, not minimum. That works out to be ~$15/hr for a job that requires schooling BEYOND A BACHELORS degree and is directly responsible for preparing the next generation of Americans to be competitive in the private sector.
In 2000 I entered the professional computer field at a starting pay of $43k. I would rank the importance of teachers higher than my job, and ten years later, they make $10k less, not even adjusted for inflation? How do we expect to draw any interest to the noble profession of education like this? What sort of America do we expect to have in 2030?
In summary, in addition to some austerity, can we just tax the rich modestly already so that we don't have to make cuts as draconian as these?
Shoulda took the $$$ and ran like Steve Miller [An ode to deferred compensation]
A brief look at "Other Post Employee Benefit Plans: A Case for Shifting to the Defined Contribution Approach", or, what's going to become of the sick leave conversion program
http://www.alec.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Public_Employee_Other_Post_Employment_Benefit_Plans&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=15517
Article summary: "The solution to the funding crises in state pension plans will require fundamental reform. Everything should be on the table, including changes in benefits and increased employee contribution rates, as well as employer contribution rates. These plans should consider replacing their defined benefit plans with defined-contribution plans for new employees."
A ~30 page discussion, which is more informative than the 1 second sound clip of "We're broke" on repeat.
link: http://www.alec.org/am/pdf/tax/alec_opeb.pdf
//////////////////////
- Page 7 is interesting. They focus on a $5/hr difference in benefits while they show a wage difference of $6/hr, using simple percentages instead to divert attention. Could it be because the higher wages are justified as perhaps the jobs you are comparing are not apples to apples? Seems to me that if you wanted to rag about cost, you'd rag about the $6/hr wage difference, not the $5/hr benefits difference.
- Read the right hand column on page 15. I've copy and pasted it here for your perusal.
The Decrease in Private Sector Retiree Health Benefits
Not surprisingly, private sector companies began
to reform their retiree health benefits to reduce
or eliminate these costs. From 1997 to 2008, the
share of workers in the private sector who were offered
health benefits in early retirement fell from 31
percent to 22 percent. Over this same time period,
the share of workers eligible for Medicare in the private
sector who were offered health benefits in retirement
decreased from 28 percent to 17 percent
(Fronstin, 2010).
This trend away from retiree health benefits was even
greater in large private firms with more than 500 employees.
The share of these firms offering health benefits
to early retirees decreased from 46 percent to
28 percent while the retiree health benefits to Medicare
eligible retirees in these firms decreased from
40 percent to 21 percent (Fronstin, 2010).
By 2006, more than half of large private sector employers
had closed their subsidized retiree health
benefits to new employees. Many firms continued
to offer retiree health plans, but required employees
to pay the full cost of the health insurance. These
are referred to as “access only” plans. In 2009, 46
percent of private sector employers offered “access
only” plans to early retirees and 41 percent offered
these plans to Medicare-eligible retirees. Many retirees
continue to enroll in these “access only” plans because the group-based premium for health insurance
is lower than that available in the non-group
market (Fronstin, 2010).
me
--
While it may be a reality it is not a triumph. Corporations are forgoing healthcare at an alarming rate because they found they can dump folks on Medicare. No wonder the costs of Medicare are skyrocketing? Of course, the tea party also has an axe of grind with Medicare costs, with a $500M cut in Wisconsin alone, and refuse healthcare reform that could lower costs. This is a 'have cake and eat it too' moment.
--
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
- The bottom left hand column on page 17 argues that bailing out pension and health plans is bad. Fine, but if we are unwilling to socialize this risk, why should I as a taxpayer be willing to socialize the risk of a corporation? Why are the states not 'too big to fail', yet the banks are? Mixed message much? I agree that California is in one hell of a world of hurt, but I'm not sure Wisconsin is California.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
- From page 27:
Legislators have an incentive to offer generous retiree health insurance plans as an alternative to higher wages and salaries. The latter must be paid for out of current budgets while the cost of retiree health insurance is deferred to the future. If unfunded liabilities accumulate in these plans, those costs will also be incurred by future generations. Another moral hazard is introduced if state legislators anticipate that the federal government will bail them out when they cannot pay for the generous pension and health benefits they have promised to retirees. In short, all the incentives are wrong in defined-benefit retiree health plans. Rather than address the problem of growing unfunded liabilities in OPEB plans, the incentive is to defer the problem to future generations.
me
---
I started thinking to myself at this point; you know, they're right. Shame on us public workers for accepting deferred compensation. Boy were we idiots. We should have demanded the $$$ up front.
---
And finally, another shoutout to a Tier 1.5 friend
- Page 2: Thanks, University of Kansas School of Business!
http://www.alec.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Public_Employee_Other_Post_Employment_Benefit_Plans&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=15517
Article summary: "The solution to the funding crises in state pension plans will require fundamental reform. Everything should be on the table, including changes in benefits and increased employee contribution rates, as well as employer contribution rates. These plans should consider replacing their defined benefit plans with defined-contribution plans for new employees."
A ~30 page discussion, which is more informative than the 1 second sound clip of "We're broke" on repeat.
link: http://www.alec.org/am/pdf/tax/alec_opeb.pdf
//////////////////////
- Page 7 is interesting. They focus on a $5/hr difference in benefits while they show a wage difference of $6/hr, using simple percentages instead to divert attention. Could it be because the higher wages are justified as perhaps the jobs you are comparing are not apples to apples? Seems to me that if you wanted to rag about cost, you'd rag about the $6/hr wage difference, not the $5/hr benefits difference.
- Read the right hand column on page 15. I've copy and pasted it here for your perusal.
The Decrease in Private Sector Retiree Health Benefits
Not surprisingly, private sector companies began
to reform their retiree health benefits to reduce
or eliminate these costs. From 1997 to 2008, the
share of workers in the private sector who were offered
health benefits in early retirement fell from 31
percent to 22 percent. Over this same time period,
the share of workers eligible for Medicare in the private
sector who were offered health benefits in retirement
decreased from 28 percent to 17 percent
(Fronstin, 2010).
This trend away from retiree health benefits was even
greater in large private firms with more than 500 employees.
The share of these firms offering health benefits
to early retirees decreased from 46 percent to
28 percent while the retiree health benefits to Medicare
eligible retirees in these firms decreased from
40 percent to 21 percent (Fronstin, 2010).
By 2006, more than half of large private sector employers
had closed their subsidized retiree health
benefits to new employees. Many firms continued
to offer retiree health plans, but required employees
to pay the full cost of the health insurance. These
are referred to as “access only” plans. In 2009, 46
percent of private sector employers offered “access
only” plans to early retirees and 41 percent offered
these plans to Medicare-eligible retirees. Many retirees
continue to enroll in these “access only” plans because the group-based premium for health insurance
is lower than that available in the non-group
market (Fronstin, 2010).
me
--
While it may be a reality it is not a triumph. Corporations are forgoing healthcare at an alarming rate because they found they can dump folks on Medicare. No wonder the costs of Medicare are skyrocketing? Of course, the tea party also has an axe of grind with Medicare costs, with a $500M cut in Wisconsin alone, and refuse healthcare reform that could lower costs. This is a 'have cake and eat it too' moment.
--
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
- The bottom left hand column on page 17 argues that bailing out pension and health plans is bad. Fine, but if we are unwilling to socialize this risk, why should I as a taxpayer be willing to socialize the risk of a corporation? Why are the states not 'too big to fail', yet the banks are? Mixed message much? I agree that California is in one hell of a world of hurt, but I'm not sure Wisconsin is California.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
- From page 27:
Legislators have an incentive to offer generous retiree health insurance plans as an alternative to higher wages and salaries. The latter must be paid for out of current budgets while the cost of retiree health insurance is deferred to the future. If unfunded liabilities accumulate in these plans, those costs will also be incurred by future generations. Another moral hazard is introduced if state legislators anticipate that the federal government will bail them out when they cannot pay for the generous pension and health benefits they have promised to retirees. In short, all the incentives are wrong in defined-benefit retiree health plans. Rather than address the problem of growing unfunded liabilities in OPEB plans, the incentive is to defer the problem to future generations.
me
---
I started thinking to myself at this point; you know, they're right. Shame on us public workers for accepting deferred compensation. Boy were we idiots. We should have demanded the $$$ up front.
---
And finally, another shoutout to a Tier 1.5 friend
- Page 2: Thanks, University of Kansas School of Business!
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
The only conservative I admire is Alex P Keaton
Shout goes out to a tier 1.5 friend who pointed out the following URL;
http://scholarcitizen.williamcronon.net/2011/03/15/alec/
The above blog proposes that an organization called ALEC is responsible for the wash of legislation across the Red states in the country. I suspect there are multiple sources for legislation, yet finding even a single one is a GREAT find, as it at least foreshadows what is coming, and gives us a chance to have some intelligent discussion on these issues compared to just swallowing terribly constructed lines from our elected officials who, I am convinced more everyday don't understand what they are doing and are just regurtigating think-tank suggestions.
Whether you fundamentally agree on the solutions proposed, the ALEC webpage lists several publications on various issues with publications that are well thought out from a conservative point of view.
http://www.alec.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Publications
It's obvious that ALEC is proud of their card carrying member Mr Scott Walker
http://www.alec.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=ALEC_Commends_Gov_Walker_for_Decreasing_Burdens_on_Businesses_by_Reforming_Wisconsin_s_Legal_System
While I've gotten through barely any of this content, amazingly, at a quick glance, the budget repair bill and the budget proposal have obviously taken cues from these titles.
# The State Factor
# The State Legislators Guide to Repealing ObamaCare
# EPA's Regulatory Train Wreck
# Report Card on American Education
# Rich States, Poor States
# School Choice and State Constitutions
# Disorder in the Court
# 10 Questions State Legislators Should Ask About Higher Education
# 2010 State Legislators Guide to Prescription Drug Policy
# State Pension Funds Fall Off a Cliff
# State Budget Reform Toolkit
# Other Post Employee Benefit Plans: A Case for Shifting to the Defined Contribution Approach
I'm going to do a 'shallow' dive into each publication as seperate blog entries over the next few days with respect to how they apply to current events in Wisconsin.
http://scholarcitizen.williamcronon.net/2011/03/15/alec/
The above blog proposes that an organization called ALEC is responsible for the wash of legislation across the Red states in the country. I suspect there are multiple sources for legislation, yet finding even a single one is a GREAT find, as it at least foreshadows what is coming, and gives us a chance to have some intelligent discussion on these issues compared to just swallowing terribly constructed lines from our elected officials who, I am convinced more everyday don't understand what they are doing and are just regurtigating think-tank suggestions.
Whether you fundamentally agree on the solutions proposed, the ALEC webpage lists several publications on various issues with publications that are well thought out from a conservative point of view.
http://www.alec.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Publications
It's obvious that ALEC is proud of their card carrying member Mr Scott Walker
http://www.alec.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=ALEC_Commends_Gov_Walker_for_Decreasing_Burdens_on_Businesses_by_Reforming_Wisconsin_s_Legal_System
While I've gotten through barely any of this content, amazingly, at a quick glance, the budget repair bill and the budget proposal have obviously taken cues from these titles.
# The State Factor
# The State Legislators Guide to Repealing ObamaCare
# EPA's Regulatory Train Wreck
# Report Card on American Education
# Rich States, Poor States
# School Choice and State Constitutions
# Disorder in the Court
# 10 Questions State Legislators Should Ask About Higher Education
# 2010 State Legislators Guide to Prescription Drug Policy
# State Pension Funds Fall Off a Cliff
# State Budget Reform Toolkit
# Other Post Employee Benefit Plans: A Case for Shifting to the Defined Contribution Approach
I'm going to do a 'shallow' dive into each publication as seperate blog entries over the next few days with respect to how they apply to current events in Wisconsin.
Monday, March 14, 2011
Who's next?
A short blog about the protests and what it means to China, but it leaves a lot to think about.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703560404576188981829658442.html
But my favorite quote is:
"Several million unemployed college graduates are far more dangerous to a modernizing regime than hundreds of millions of poor peasants."
Another quote:
"... social consciousness is swiftly evolving through a myriad of text messages, shared videos or simple conversations."
I had planned to write a whole blog regarding the idea directly above, but this pretty much summarizes it nicely. Social consciousness is demanding transparency in local Governments and therefore the global community.
Conspiracy theory time; many conservatives in office are urging for large cuts in education. Unless you are living under a rock you see world power shifting out of the US towards, mainly, China. Do conservatives think that by not educating people they will keep power over the people in this country? Are conservatives selling off public assets because they equate socialism with communism? Are we seeing the conservatives last stand against the socialization of humanity on a global scale?
A month ago I would have certainly said that one megaphone with one voice shouting louder than the masses would prevail. I'm not so sure anymore, I think we are seeing the early stages of a global awakening. I fear the geeks might have the largest fight of all coming; I forsee an attempted global clampdown on communications and social networking coming. Have mercy on the first party to openly shred the first amendment in the US by attempting to do so [freedom of speech, right to petition the Government]. I know we have had some struggles lately in Madison, but we're not -quite- there yet.
"... If the country's current property bubble bursts and tens of millions of people are thrown out of work, the government's legitimacy, which rests on its management of the economy, would be seriously undermined."
Personal note; I do not condone communism, and personally think communism will be ultimate undoing of China as their people become more educated.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703560404576188981829658442.html
But my favorite quote is:
"Several million unemployed college graduates are far more dangerous to a modernizing regime than hundreds of millions of poor peasants."
Another quote:
"... social consciousness is swiftly evolving through a myriad of text messages, shared videos or simple conversations."
I had planned to write a whole blog regarding the idea directly above, but this pretty much summarizes it nicely. Social consciousness is demanding transparency in local Governments and therefore the global community.
Conspiracy theory time; many conservatives in office are urging for large cuts in education. Unless you are living under a rock you see world power shifting out of the US towards, mainly, China. Do conservatives think that by not educating people they will keep power over the people in this country? Are conservatives selling off public assets because they equate socialism with communism? Are we seeing the conservatives last stand against the socialization of humanity on a global scale?
A month ago I would have certainly said that one megaphone with one voice shouting louder than the masses would prevail. I'm not so sure anymore, I think we are seeing the early stages of a global awakening. I fear the geeks might have the largest fight of all coming; I forsee an attempted global clampdown on communications and social networking coming. Have mercy on the first party to openly shred the first amendment in the US by attempting to do so [freedom of speech, right to petition the Government]. I know we have had some struggles lately in Madison, but we're not -quite- there yet.
"... If the country's current property bubble bursts and tens of millions of people are thrown out of work, the government's legitimacy, which rests on its management of the economy, would be seriously undermined."
Personal note; I do not condone communism, and personally think communism will be ultimate undoing of China as their people become more educated.
Saturday, March 12, 2011
MH goes to Washington
I sent the below message to our Washington Representatives. You have to fill out a form, they do not publish email addresses. I note that Tammy Baldwin had campaign finance reform as a drop down on the 'topics' list. Ron Johnson didn't, he did have 'Government Reform'. Herb Kohl, the seventh richest member of Congress with an estimated net worth of $200 million+ dollars, had neither as a topic of concern.
http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/02/income-inequality-in-america-chart-graph
===================
[To: Ron Johnson, Herb Kohl, and Tammy Baldwin].
I have joined the legion of citizens in the United States that feel our elected officials are more interested in entrenching their own power than moving the country forward, as do many of my fellow Wisconsinites.
American's faith in Congress is at an all time low. According to recent polls the U.S has a 13% approval rating on what is happening in Congress. 13%!
http://www.gallup.com/poll/145238/congress-job-approval-rating-worst-gallup-history.aspx
In the last decade I have seen unfunded wars, corporate bailouts costing a trillion dollars. I am watching our elected officials suggest that defunding education in a knowledge based economy as prudent. I have watched 50 years of labor piece being destroyed in 25 days [in what was supposed to be a few days per Walker's administrations unprecedented mandate], and I have seen the head of the Wisconsin Senate say publicly on Fox News Wisconsin's union busting will make it more difficult to get Obama elected in 2012.
A lack of bipartisianship and a lack of willingness to confront our actual problems is destroying the competitive edge that the United States used to have in the world. The citizens of the United States do not elect our leaders of this country to fight like children for domination. We elect you to move this country forward, not backwards.
In the last three weeks, I have seen one thing in common in Wisconsin. Democratic and Republican fundraising letters begging for grassroots supporters and funds to fight 'big money coming from Washington'.
May I assume, Senators and Representatives, that you are working on a bipartisian solution to end the problem of 'big money coming from Washington' in political campaigns?
Thank you for your consideration.
http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/02/income-inequality-in-america-chart-graph
===================
[To: Ron Johnson, Herb Kohl, and Tammy Baldwin].
I have joined the legion of citizens in the United States that feel our elected officials are more interested in entrenching their own power than moving the country forward, as do many of my fellow Wisconsinites.
American's faith in Congress is at an all time low. According to recent polls the U.S has a 13% approval rating on what is happening in Congress. 13%!
http://www.gallup.com/poll/145238/congress-job-approval-rating-worst-gallup-history.aspx
In the last decade I have seen unfunded wars, corporate bailouts costing a trillion dollars. I am watching our elected officials suggest that defunding education in a knowledge based economy as prudent. I have watched 50 years of labor piece being destroyed in 25 days [in what was supposed to be a few days per Walker's administrations unprecedented mandate], and I have seen the head of the Wisconsin Senate say publicly on Fox News Wisconsin's union busting will make it more difficult to get Obama elected in 2012.
A lack of bipartisianship and a lack of willingness to confront our actual problems is destroying the competitive edge that the United States used to have in the world. The citizens of the United States do not elect our leaders of this country to fight like children for domination. We elect you to move this country forward, not backwards.
In the last three weeks, I have seen one thing in common in Wisconsin. Democratic and Republican fundraising letters begging for grassroots supporters and funds to fight 'big money coming from Washington'.
May I assume, Senators and Representatives, that you are working on a bipartisian solution to end the problem of 'big money coming from Washington' in political campaigns?
Thank you for your consideration.
Friday, March 11, 2011
S**T on your neighbor
Here is what is not going to work. Let's put all of our eggs in the 'attract business' basket at all costs. Lets cut education, let's cut healthcare, let's cut all the social services and tax everyone in the lower income brackets more. Also, lets sell off all public assets, because inserting a middleman is sure to save money.
[Current events in Michigan]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUpO1QFMDtM&feature=player_embedded
Consider this; if there was enough work to go around we wouldn't have this problem. Technology is improving. What is there simply will never be enough jobs to go around ever again? What if there are not enough jobs for the number of people on the planet to coexist with the greedy underpinnings of capitalism? Will we let people starve? Die? There has to be a social aspect of American capitalism unless we are all willing to compete with the most opprossed workers on the planet.
Where are we [Wisconsin] attracing jobs from? Does Walker think that Megacorps are going to abandon their low wage oversea factories and come back to Wisconsin over a few measly million dollars? No. Walker puts on a dog and pony show about stealing jobs from Illinois, mocking Democrats that are trying to increase revenue through taxation. "WISCONSIN IS OPEN FOR BUSINESS". As if Illinois, another state in our nation, was some sort of enemy that damaging is OK. Illinois, some sort of combatant that we must outdo. This isn't football folks. This isn't Packers vs Bears. Christ people, this is the -UNITED- States of America. Is it your best plan to lay hurt to another STATE IN OUR NATION?
The only conclusion I can draw is that this attitude, this mindsight, implies that you are putting the power of your own political party ABOVE THE INTERESTS OF THE NATION. Fitzgerald so as much said this on FOX. This is the same man that has decided the laws in the WI constitution need not apply to his majority party.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLJdijPEBJE&feature=player_embedded
WHY would someone do that?
We aren't creating jobs this way. At best we are hoping to move them around the states in a race to the bottom. Pensions, healthcare, education. These are all things America does not need if you believe the Republican agenda.
In the meantime, high labor jobs continue to be exported offshore, and the only reasonable solution is to out innovate the rest of the world. We need to stay ahead if we want to have a standard of living that is higher than a third world country.
We can't out innovate by slashing education.
The Republicans are pushing a vicious cycle to the bottom.
S**T on your neighbor will bankrupt America and reward those who can transfer wealth out of the U.S.
[Current events in Michigan]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUpO1QFMDtM&feature=player_embedded
Consider this; if there was enough work to go around we wouldn't have this problem. Technology is improving. What is there simply will never be enough jobs to go around ever again? What if there are not enough jobs for the number of people on the planet to coexist with the greedy underpinnings of capitalism? Will we let people starve? Die? There has to be a social aspect of American capitalism unless we are all willing to compete with the most opprossed workers on the planet.
Where are we [Wisconsin] attracing jobs from? Does Walker think that Megacorps are going to abandon their low wage oversea factories and come back to Wisconsin over a few measly million dollars? No. Walker puts on a dog and pony show about stealing jobs from Illinois, mocking Democrats that are trying to increase revenue through taxation. "WISCONSIN IS OPEN FOR BUSINESS". As if Illinois, another state in our nation, was some sort of enemy that damaging is OK. Illinois, some sort of combatant that we must outdo. This isn't football folks. This isn't Packers vs Bears. Christ people, this is the -UNITED- States of America. Is it your best plan to lay hurt to another STATE IN OUR NATION?
The only conclusion I can draw is that this attitude, this mindsight, implies that you are putting the power of your own political party ABOVE THE INTERESTS OF THE NATION. Fitzgerald so as much said this on FOX. This is the same man that has decided the laws in the WI constitution need not apply to his majority party.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLJdijPEBJE&feature=player_embedded
WHY would someone do that?
We aren't creating jobs this way. At best we are hoping to move them around the states in a race to the bottom. Pensions, healthcare, education. These are all things America does not need if you believe the Republican agenda.
In the meantime, high labor jobs continue to be exported offshore, and the only reasonable solution is to out innovate the rest of the world. We need to stay ahead if we want to have a standard of living that is higher than a third world country.
We can't out innovate by slashing education.
The Republicans are pushing a vicious cycle to the bottom.
S**T on your neighbor will bankrupt America and reward those who can transfer wealth out of the U.S.
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Scott Walker, God called. He said "Go to Hell".
I'd love to see the math that says cutting compensation 10%+ will create jobs. Really. I'd love to see how slashing education and driving talent out of the state will create jobs. Scott, are you a broken record? Your inability to articulate even the slighest concept of how this helps "the private sector create 250,000 new jobs" is astounding. Really, astounding.
Reducing takehome pay by 10% is not "modest" for all of our teachers. You will make the next generation of great teachers have to choose between teaching and having enough money to live. Per your words, I guess they'll have to go 'into the private sector [and make] real money', since they are not "one of you".
Koch Call transcript. Governor's own words were:
"Well, actually, in his case I wouldn’t call him and I’ll tell you why: He’s pretty reasonable but he’s not one of us, um, so I would let him be. I think he is in a position where he can maybe motivate that caucus, but he’s not a, he’s not an ally, he’s just a, he’s just a guy. He was in the Senate years ago. He was actually the Senate (word missing) here back in the ’80s and Tommy Thompson hired him to be the head of Health and Human Services. He went into the private sector, made real money and, uh, became a little more more open-minded."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shame on your for your regressive taxes on public educators! Teachers who are responsible for educating the next generation of Americans have not fiscally bankrupted Wisconsin or the US. DID EVERYONE FORGET THE TRILLION DOLLAR BAILOUTS AND THE TRILLION DOLLAR WARS?!?!?!?!?
But I guess you've "dropped the bomb" on the people now, didn't you? Aren't you so proud of yourself?
Koch Call transcript.
http://host.madison.com/wsj/article_531276b6-3f6a-11e0-b288-001cc4c002e0.html
Governor's own words were:
"Came home from the Super Bowl where the Packers won, and that Monday night I had all of my cabinet over to the residence for dinner. Talked about what we were gonna do, how we were gonna do it. We’d already kinda built plans up, but it was kind of the last hurrah before we dropped the bomb. And I stood up and I pulled out a picture of Ronald Reagan, and I said, you know, this may seem a little melodramatic, but 30 years ago, Ronald Reagan, whose 100th birthday we just celebrated the day before, had one of the most defining moments of his political career, not just his presidency, when he fired the air-traffic controllers."
-----------------------------------------------------------
How could we have allowed our democracy to be whored out to the highest bidder? How can the people of the United States not be outraged that CEOs can all but buy votes with their dollars with unlimited PAC contributions, with the Citizens United vs F.E.C 2010 Supreme Court ruling? Do the below words sound like someone who is interested in balancing a budget to you?
Koch Call transcript.
http://host.madison.com/wsj/article_531276b6-3f6a-11e0-b288-001cc4c002e0.html
Governor's own words were:
Murphy: [Laughs] Well, I tell you what, Scott: once you crush these bastards I’ll fly you out to Cali and really show you a good time.
Walker: All right, that would be outstanding. Thanks, thanks for all the support and helping us move the cause forward, and we appreciate it. We’re, uh, we’re doing the just and right thing for the right reasons, and it’s all about getting our freedoms back.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Closer to home, 50 years of labor peace in Wisconsin shred thanks to one man and 18 Senate Republicans on tow. And speaking of peace, how about thinking of endangering public safety and backing down out of fear of not getting your ideological wishes?
Koch Call transcript.
http://host.madison.com/wsj/article_531276b6-3f6a-11e0-b288-001cc4c002e0.html
Governor's own words were:
Murphy: Right, right. Well, we’ll back you any way we can. But, uh, what we were thinking about the crowds was, uh, was planting some troublemakers.
Walker: You know, the, well, the only problem with that — because we thought about that. The problem — the, my only gut reaction to that is right now the lawmakers I’ve talked to have just completely had it with them, the public is not really fond of this. The teachers union did some polling of focus groups, I think, and found out that the public turned on ’em the minute they closed school down for a couple days. The guys we’ve got left are largely from out of state, and I keep dismissing it in all my press conferences saying, ‘Eh, they’re mostly from out of state.’ My only fear would be is if there was a ruckus caused is that that would scare the public into thinking maybe the governor has gotta settle to avoid all these problems.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Republicans, I think you will find out that trying to oppress voices of the masses will be a very bad move. You should have backed away when your "King" made an ass of himself and democracy during the Koch call.
A clear public majority strong opposed stripping collective bargaining.
The Wisconsin Assembly convenes at 11am. While this bill -will- pass tomorrow, may the people of Wisconsin flood the streets of Madison tomorrow to have their voices heard.
I sometimes question whether Government will ever function again as intended by our founders. There is so much vitrol in legislative bodies across America that I see no way to meet common ground. I am so tired of all of the name calling, the lies, the posturing.
Thank you, Dale Schultz, for not being an extremist, and for going down in history as voting NO.
How could one defend this man after hearing the Koch call?
Goodnight Wisconsin.
Reducing takehome pay by 10% is not "modest" for all of our teachers. You will make the next generation of great teachers have to choose between teaching and having enough money to live. Per your words, I guess they'll have to go 'into the private sector [and make] real money', since they are not "one of you".
Koch Call transcript. Governor's own words were:
"Well, actually, in his case I wouldn’t call him and I’ll tell you why: He’s pretty reasonable but he’s not one of us, um, so I would let him be. I think he is in a position where he can maybe motivate that caucus, but he’s not a, he’s not an ally, he’s just a, he’s just a guy. He was in the Senate years ago. He was actually the Senate (word missing) here back in the ’80s and Tommy Thompson hired him to be the head of Health and Human Services. He went into the private sector, made real money and, uh, became a little more more open-minded."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Shame on your for your regressive taxes on public educators! Teachers who are responsible for educating the next generation of Americans have not fiscally bankrupted Wisconsin or the US. DID EVERYONE FORGET THE TRILLION DOLLAR BAILOUTS AND THE TRILLION DOLLAR WARS?!?!?!?!?
But I guess you've "dropped the bomb" on the people now, didn't you? Aren't you so proud of yourself?
Koch Call transcript.
http://host.madison.com/wsj/article_531276b6-3f6a-11e0-b288-001cc4c002e0.html
Governor's own words were:
"Came home from the Super Bowl where the Packers won, and that Monday night I had all of my cabinet over to the residence for dinner. Talked about what we were gonna do, how we were gonna do it. We’d already kinda built plans up, but it was kind of the last hurrah before we dropped the bomb. And I stood up and I pulled out a picture of Ronald Reagan, and I said, you know, this may seem a little melodramatic, but 30 years ago, Ronald Reagan, whose 100th birthday we just celebrated the day before, had one of the most defining moments of his political career, not just his presidency, when he fired the air-traffic controllers."
-----------------------------------------------------------
How could we have allowed our democracy to be whored out to the highest bidder? How can the people of the United States not be outraged that CEOs can all but buy votes with their dollars with unlimited PAC contributions, with the Citizens United vs F.E.C 2010 Supreme Court ruling? Do the below words sound like someone who is interested in balancing a budget to you?
Koch Call transcript.
http://host.madison.com/wsj/article_531276b6-3f6a-11e0-b288-001cc4c002e0.html
Governor's own words were:
Murphy: [Laughs] Well, I tell you what, Scott: once you crush these bastards I’ll fly you out to Cali and really show you a good time.
Walker: All right, that would be outstanding. Thanks, thanks for all the support and helping us move the cause forward, and we appreciate it. We’re, uh, we’re doing the just and right thing for the right reasons, and it’s all about getting our freedoms back.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Closer to home, 50 years of labor peace in Wisconsin shred thanks to one man and 18 Senate Republicans on tow. And speaking of peace, how about thinking of endangering public safety and backing down out of fear of not getting your ideological wishes?
Koch Call transcript.
http://host.madison.com/wsj/article_531276b6-3f6a-11e0-b288-001cc4c002e0.html
Governor's own words were:
Murphy: Right, right. Well, we’ll back you any way we can. But, uh, what we were thinking about the crowds was, uh, was planting some troublemakers.
Walker: You know, the, well, the only problem with that — because we thought about that. The problem — the, my only gut reaction to that is right now the lawmakers I’ve talked to have just completely had it with them, the public is not really fond of this. The teachers union did some polling of focus groups, I think, and found out that the public turned on ’em the minute they closed school down for a couple days. The guys we’ve got left are largely from out of state, and I keep dismissing it in all my press conferences saying, ‘Eh, they’re mostly from out of state.’ My only fear would be is if there was a ruckus caused is that that would scare the public into thinking maybe the governor has gotta settle to avoid all these problems.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Republicans, I think you will find out that trying to oppress voices of the masses will be a very bad move. You should have backed away when your "King" made an ass of himself and democracy during the Koch call.
A clear public majority strong opposed stripping collective bargaining.
The Wisconsin Assembly convenes at 11am. While this bill -will- pass tomorrow, may the people of Wisconsin flood the streets of Madison tomorrow to have their voices heard.
I sometimes question whether Government will ever function again as intended by our founders. There is so much vitrol in legislative bodies across America that I see no way to meet common ground. I am so tired of all of the name calling, the lies, the posturing.
Thank you, Dale Schultz, for not being an extremist, and for going down in history as voting NO.
How could one defend this man after hearing the Koch call?
Goodnight Wisconsin.
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
An attempted minority takeover from an undisclosed location in Illinois?
Two blogs, one day. Yes, its true. This one is likely to get me in trouble with non independents.
---------------------------------
Before I get started; I still think Walker and the Repubs have handled this whole thing terribly, and I still have very little trust in their respect of the political process.
That said, I think it's time for the Fab 14 to come home while both they and the public opinion are in unison.
I'm not convinced the Fab 14 alternative budget repair bill was a great idea. Scott Walker got into office on 52%/46% majority. He viewed this as a mandate to do whatever the heck he wanted. It didn't work well for him. Public polls shows 57% oppose restricting collective barganing and 37% agree with the Governor's proposal.
The world isn't black and white. Walker did -not- campaign on collective bargaining restrictions, yet the Democratic minority -must not- confuse public opinion with a mandate that the democratic minority should get to call the shots in the legislature. We just don't know if the public is for or against the whole bill, so I think the assumption they are was rather rash and possibly unwise.
I'm an independent that has voted non Republican 100% of the time, and that's unlikely to change. We are [for now] a democratically elected republic. As a protestor that has been at the Capitol seven or so times myself, I still fully support the Dem Senators 100% for providing a filibuster, allowing a chance for discourse on the bill. But it is time to come home united, let the bill pass (hopefully amended to be less evil), and let the voters decide what they want via recall and normal elections.
Walker has released emails that show some level of negotiations have been occurring. This negotiation process should be occuring in public view at the Capitol. The Democrat Senators, taking a queue from how this went down in Assembly, had full reason to believe that no compromise or debate would have occurred had they not fled. That might also happen if they come back. Heck, it's possible they would be arrested. But if so, I think it'll further shame what Walker's Administration has done. This Administration seems to have no problem digging themselves a deeper and deeper hole. The world is already watching, it's time to act now, and not to make this a media game.
I am not a union member. I am a UW employee. In a knowledge based economy, education is our ONLY future, and it will require great teachers. I am terribly concerned about what the budget repair bill and the budget proposal will do to education in the state. We need to fix America and while it might start at the local level with personal responsibility, it can really only be fixed at a national level.
Our Democratic representatives have done an -enormous- amount to forward these issues to a state -and- national level. I can't thank them enough. But please, Fab 14, come home in Solidarity, while we're still "winning".
---------------------------------
Before I get started; I still think Walker and the Repubs have handled this whole thing terribly, and I still have very little trust in their respect of the political process.
That said, I think it's time for the Fab 14 to come home while both they and the public opinion are in unison.
I'm not convinced the Fab 14 alternative budget repair bill was a great idea. Scott Walker got into office on 52%/46% majority. He viewed this as a mandate to do whatever the heck he wanted. It didn't work well for him. Public polls shows 57% oppose restricting collective barganing and 37% agree with the Governor's proposal.
The world isn't black and white. Walker did -not- campaign on collective bargaining restrictions, yet the Democratic minority -must not- confuse public opinion with a mandate that the democratic minority should get to call the shots in the legislature. We just don't know if the public is for or against the whole bill, so I think the assumption they are was rather rash and possibly unwise.
I'm an independent that has voted non Republican 100% of the time, and that's unlikely to change. We are [for now] a democratically elected republic. As a protestor that has been at the Capitol seven or so times myself, I still fully support the Dem Senators 100% for providing a filibuster, allowing a chance for discourse on the bill. But it is time to come home united, let the bill pass (hopefully amended to be less evil), and let the voters decide what they want via recall and normal elections.
Walker has released emails that show some level of negotiations have been occurring. This negotiation process should be occuring in public view at the Capitol. The Democrat Senators, taking a queue from how this went down in Assembly, had full reason to believe that no compromise or debate would have occurred had they not fled. That might also happen if they come back. Heck, it's possible they would be arrested. But if so, I think it'll further shame what Walker's Administration has done. This Administration seems to have no problem digging themselves a deeper and deeper hole. The world is already watching, it's time to act now, and not to make this a media game.
I am not a union member. I am a UW employee. In a knowledge based economy, education is our ONLY future, and it will require great teachers. I am terribly concerned about what the budget repair bill and the budget proposal will do to education in the state. We need to fix America and while it might start at the local level with personal responsibility, it can really only be fixed at a national level.
Our Democratic representatives have done an -enormous- amount to forward these issues to a state -and- national level. I can't thank them enough. But please, Fab 14, come home in Solidarity, while we're still "winning".
I'm not the enemy. I am part of the problem, and part of the solution.
Without a doubt, the U.S. in 2014 will look very different than the U.S. in 2011. Exactly how it looks will be decided by the whether or not the people of this country want a say Unless you believe our entire country is better off being privatized, you better start paying attention.
Parts of our country are being held hostage by a minority of freshmen Republicans who see compromise as capitulation to the enemy instead of embracing the desires and goals of 300,000,000 Americans working together to achieve a common goal.
These new breed of idealists are not interested in intelligent debate. Some are extremely uncouth. Some seem so idelogical that they don't seem to really care or understand that educational cuts will destroy America. Education is our last stand to succeed in a knowledge based economy. We need this more than ever given our manufaturing base economy has been exported in the last 30 years, which for those counting, included 20 years with a Republican president and 8 years with a Democrat president. None of them were interested in stopping the train wreck.
After the essentially criminal behavior that occurred in our finacial markets in 2008~2009, Americans have a lot to be upset about. But if an idealogue gets into the White House in 2012 with their no holds barred "I'm not listening to you" attitude, God help us all. They view the privitzation of everything as the solution. Government is not a business. The Constitution wasn't written during a time of global mega conglomerates. Something has to change.
With that, some commentary from CNN, followed by a selection of other interesting things happening in the U.S.
CNN from Feb 24th:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/02/24/borger.budget.cutters/index.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michigan: Republicans are threatening a takeover of the entire state. Their budget deficit is approximately $1.6B a year, less than Wisconsins.
http://www.freep.com/article/20110307/NEWS15/110307035/Rally-planned-Tuesday-Lansing-AFL-CIO-seeks-block-emergency-financial-manager-legislation
"The legislation in the Republican-controlled Senate would give emergency financial managers authority to dissolve local governments and school boards, assume management control and even order millage elections."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minnesota's Michelle Bachmann is not a voice I want representing America.
http://www.examiner.com/democrat-in-national/michele-bachmann-claims-obama-government-corrupt-gangster-video
Her views on global warming are entertaining.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michele_Bachmann#Global_warming
She stated that because life requires CO2 and it is part of the planet's life cycle, it cannot be harmful. Based on her argument, water and oxygen also can't be harmful. Oxygen is extremely combustible. Have you heard of water intoxication?
------------------------------------------------------------
Montana has a few gems.
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/feb2011/2011-02-22-092.html
"They are also protesting against bills by State Representative Joe Read, a Republican, to declare global warming "natural" and "beneficial," and to prevent the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gases."
me> I guess Joe Read hasn't put it together that global warming means the entire coastline, tens of millions of people, are projected to be underwater [literally] by 2100. He who dies with the most dollars still dies, Joe.
"A bill introduced by Representative Dan Kennedy, a Laurel Republican, would amend the Montana State Constitution to add the words "and economically productive" following "clean and healthful."
me> Repeat after me; central government is a socialist entity. It is not a buisness. You might as well disband government if you are going to put profits before all else. Government is here to keep society going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
New York has determined that only Islam is the enemy, but the real enemy to U.S. and the planet is radicalization and extremism from any source.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/07/muslims-and-supporters-pr_n_832558.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The New Hampshire Republican majority thinks that college students shouldn't be allowed to vote because they vote liberal. Seriously, disenfranchasing Liberal -and- Conservative voters in the 18-24 age group? Shame on you for expecting the younger generation to accept a dystopian future where their voice isn't valued. This fits in well with what is happening in Utah.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/06/AR2011030602662.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ohio, which is doing union busting just like in Wisconsin, decided to rig the vote once it became clear that it wasn't going to pass.
http://politics.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474979114099
Apparently, Sen. Tom Niehaus, with his bill and union-busting desires in danger of failing, chose to decide the will of the legislative body by removing two members of his caucus, to ensure the bill would pass. The bill did, in fact, pass by a slim margin of 17-16, with six other Republicans voting against it. The bill now moves on to the House where Republicans hold a much larger majority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Utah, among other grand things, is trying to do away with open records laws. My assumption here is the belief that open record laws don't exist for private buisnesses, and since their idea of Government is a Republican coutrolled plutocracy, Government doesn't need it either.
http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-salt-lake-city/utah-legislator-insists-we-are-a-republic
Parts of our country are being held hostage by a minority of freshmen Republicans who see compromise as capitulation to the enemy instead of embracing the desires and goals of 300,000,000 Americans working together to achieve a common goal.
These new breed of idealists are not interested in intelligent debate. Some are extremely uncouth. Some seem so idelogical that they don't seem to really care or understand that educational cuts will destroy America. Education is our last stand to succeed in a knowledge based economy. We need this more than ever given our manufaturing base economy has been exported in the last 30 years, which for those counting, included 20 years with a Republican president and 8 years with a Democrat president. None of them were interested in stopping the train wreck.
After the essentially criminal behavior that occurred in our finacial markets in 2008~2009, Americans have a lot to be upset about. But if an idealogue gets into the White House in 2012 with their no holds barred "I'm not listening to you" attitude, God help us all. They view the privitzation of everything as the solution. Government is not a business. The Constitution wasn't written during a time of global mega conglomerates. Something has to change.
With that, some commentary from CNN, followed by a selection of other interesting things happening in the U.S.
CNN from Feb 24th:
http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/02/24/borger.budget.cutters/index.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michigan: Republicans are threatening a takeover of the entire state. Their budget deficit is approximately $1.6B a year, less than Wisconsins.
http://www.freep.com/article/20110307/NEWS15/110307035/Rally-planned-Tuesday-Lansing-AFL-CIO-seeks-block-emergency-financial-manager-legislation
"The legislation in the Republican-controlled Senate would give emergency financial managers authority to dissolve local governments and school boards, assume management control and even order millage elections."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minnesota's Michelle Bachmann is not a voice I want representing America.
http://www.examiner.com/democrat-in-national/michele-bachmann-claims-obama-government-corrupt-gangster-video
Her views on global warming are entertaining.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michele_Bachmann#Global_warming
She stated that because life requires CO2 and it is part of the planet's life cycle, it cannot be harmful. Based on her argument, water and oxygen also can't be harmful. Oxygen is extremely combustible. Have you heard of water intoxication?
------------------------------------------------------------
Montana has a few gems.
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/feb2011/2011-02-22-092.html
"They are also protesting against bills by State Representative Joe Read, a Republican, to declare global warming "natural" and "beneficial," and to prevent the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gases."
me> I guess Joe Read hasn't put it together that global warming means the entire coastline, tens of millions of people, are projected to be underwater [literally] by 2100. He who dies with the most dollars still dies, Joe.
"A bill introduced by Representative Dan Kennedy, a Laurel Republican, would amend the Montana State Constitution to add the words "and economically productive" following "clean and healthful."
me> Repeat after me; central government is a socialist entity. It is not a buisness. You might as well disband government if you are going to put profits before all else. Government is here to keep society going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
New York has determined that only Islam is the enemy, but the real enemy to U.S. and the planet is radicalization and extremism from any source.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/07/muslims-and-supporters-pr_n_832558.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The New Hampshire Republican majority thinks that college students shouldn't be allowed to vote because they vote liberal. Seriously, disenfranchasing Liberal -and- Conservative voters in the 18-24 age group? Shame on you for expecting the younger generation to accept a dystopian future where their voice isn't valued. This fits in well with what is happening in Utah.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/06/AR2011030602662.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ohio, which is doing union busting just like in Wisconsin, decided to rig the vote once it became clear that it wasn't going to pass.
http://politics.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474979114099
Apparently, Sen. Tom Niehaus, with his bill and union-busting desires in danger of failing, chose to decide the will of the legislative body by removing two members of his caucus, to ensure the bill would pass. The bill did, in fact, pass by a slim margin of 17-16, with six other Republicans voting against it. The bill now moves on to the House where Republicans hold a much larger majority.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Utah, among other grand things, is trying to do away with open records laws. My assumption here is the belief that open record laws don't exist for private buisnesses, and since their idea of Government is a Republican coutrolled plutocracy, Government doesn't need it either.
http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-salt-lake-city/utah-legislator-insists-we-are-a-republic
Monday, March 7, 2011
Newspeak
Michael Hare, 2011:
"I think Scott Walker is going down a slippery slope. If he's going to do this now for those who make $70,000 a year, when's he going to decide that $50,000 is too much, you know? I mean, you're on a slippery slope here. You vote on somebody who decides that $70,000 makes you're rich? And $50,000 and you're rich? I mean, where does it end? you know, that's - people got to ask that question."
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Americans for Prosperity [Koch Brothers] are busing Ohio native Joe around Wisconsin as an outside agitator to garner support for Scott Walker. Scott Walker wants public sector workers to take a 10% pay cut. The average public sector worker makes $70k/yr with benefits.
In 2008, Joe stumped for McCain and made the following comments
from: http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/10/16/politics/horserace/entry4525242.shtml
COURIC: Well, he supposedly will raise taxes only on people who make over $250,000 a year. Would you be in that category?
WURZELBACHER: Not right now at presently, but, you know, question, so he's going to do that now for people who make $250,000 a year. When's he going to decide that $100,000 is too much, you know? I mean, you're on a slippery slope here. You vote on somebody who decides that $250,000 and you're rich? And $100,000 and you're rich? I mean, where does it end? You know, that's - people got to ask that question.
In 2011, here is what he has to say about Wisconsin
The speakers at the event both mock the anti-Walker crowd and patronize them. Wurzelbacher talks about what he saw as an attitude of entitlement among union workers: “’I deserve this, I deserve that. I deserve the money in your pocket, sir.’ Whatever happened to the word ‘earn’?”
from: http://www.thedailypage.com/daily/article.php?article=32651
Yes Joe, it's a good idea to question authority. But these 'rich' public workers are teachers, police officers, fire fighters, and hundreds of thousands of other people that you deride in our country SERVE our country. These are not people that are trying their damnedest to export wealth OUT of our country.
Look, I don't sit around deriding private workers, who consciously take a riskier job for greater reward opportunities. Joe, I think that's great. But if public workers have no security, poor benefits, and walk around with a target on their back, what quality of public workers, teachers and police officers, do you think we'll have?
Joe, I 'earn' my money. It's not like the Wisconsin taxpayers pay me to sit at home.
Read more about Joe here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_the_plumber
and some controversy surrounding Joe in the same article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_the_plumber#Personal_controversy
////////////////////////////////////////
After posting, I added the following comments else
Do yourself a favor and watch this, Joe's talk yesterday. While I don't fully agree with what he says, what he says is in a civil tone, I will credit him with that.
At about 2:30 in the presentation, the group of ~600 supporters meeting inside kicked out an anti-walker protestor. Someone yells "We don't come to your rally, leave us alone". That, my friends, is an idiot at work. They do come to our rallies. Very few of them, but they are there. Note how the Tea Party crowd tries to squash dissension. I haven't witnessed this at the Anti-Walker rally. What is the Tea Party to afraid of?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnHy81s37cc
"I think Scott Walker is going down a slippery slope. If he's going to do this now for those who make $70,000 a year, when's he going to decide that $50,000 is too much, you know? I mean, you're on a slippery slope here. You vote on somebody who decides that $70,000 makes you're rich? And $50,000 and you're rich? I mean, where does it end? you know, that's - people got to ask that question."
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Americans for Prosperity [Koch Brothers] are busing Ohio native Joe around Wisconsin as an outside agitator to garner support for Scott Walker. Scott Walker wants public sector workers to take a 10% pay cut. The average public sector worker makes $70k/yr with benefits.
In 2008, Joe stumped for McCain and made the following comments
from: http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/10/16/politics/horserace/entry4525242.shtml
COURIC: Well, he supposedly will raise taxes only on people who make over $250,000 a year. Would you be in that category?
WURZELBACHER: Not right now at presently, but, you know, question, so he's going to do that now for people who make $250,000 a year. When's he going to decide that $100,000 is too much, you know? I mean, you're on a slippery slope here. You vote on somebody who decides that $250,000 and you're rich? And $100,000 and you're rich? I mean, where does it end? You know, that's - people got to ask that question.
In 2011, here is what he has to say about Wisconsin
The speakers at the event both mock the anti-Walker crowd and patronize them. Wurzelbacher talks about what he saw as an attitude of entitlement among union workers: “’I deserve this, I deserve that. I deserve the money in your pocket, sir.’ Whatever happened to the word ‘earn’?”
from: http://www.thedailypage.com/daily/article.php?article=32651
Yes Joe, it's a good idea to question authority. But these 'rich' public workers are teachers, police officers, fire fighters, and hundreds of thousands of other people that you deride in our country SERVE our country. These are not people that are trying their damnedest to export wealth OUT of our country.
Look, I don't sit around deriding private workers, who consciously take a riskier job for greater reward opportunities. Joe, I think that's great. But if public workers have no security, poor benefits, and walk around with a target on their back, what quality of public workers, teachers and police officers, do you think we'll have?
Joe, I 'earn' my money. It's not like the Wisconsin taxpayers pay me to sit at home.
Read more about Joe here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_the_plumber
and some controversy surrounding Joe in the same article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_the_plumber#Personal_controversy
////////////////////////////////////////
After posting, I added the following comments else
Do yourself a favor and watch this, Joe's talk yesterday. While I don't fully agree with what he says, what he says is in a civil tone, I will credit him with that.
At about 2:30 in the presentation, the group of ~600 supporters meeting inside kicked out an anti-walker protestor. Someone yells "We don't come to your rally, leave us alone". That, my friends, is an idiot at work. They do come to our rallies. Very few of them, but they are there. Note how the Tea Party crowd tries to squash dissension. I haven't witnessed this at the Anti-Walker rally. What is the Tea Party to afraid of?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnHy81s37cc
Sunday, March 6, 2011
Letter to the Governor
No matter how you feel about this issue, I suggest you do the same.
If you believe in transparent Government, whether you agree or disagree with Walker's agenda for Wisconsin, you should let your voice be heard.
The Governor has claimed overwhelming support for this proposals by way of his email account. An open records request for his emails to verify these claims have been ignored. A lawsuit has been filed.
http://www.thedailypage.com/media/2011/03/04/Isthmus%20AP%20lawsuit%20press%20release%20030411.pdf
I suggest you voice your support for transparent Government by including a statement in your email. Here is what I included in mine.
"I hear that you have received an open records request for your email. I'll be looking for my email in the open records request."
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Opposition to Senate Bill 11
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 09:38:11 -0600
From: xxxxxxxxxxxx <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: govgeneral@wisconsin.gov
CC: Sen.risser@legis.wisconsin.gov, Rep.Hulsey@legis.wisconsin.gov
Governor-
[cc, my Representatives]
I am opposed to your elimination of collective bargaining as 'the' fix
to cover deficits.
I understand your argument that eliminating collective bargaining is a
timesaver. But eliminating collective bargaining doesn't fix budget
issues. Public workers are, in general, compensated less than private
workers. You are asking all public workers to take a ~10%+ pay cut.
Governor, call it what it is, a mandated ~10%+ pay cut for educators and
a slew of other professions that serve to move Wisconsin Forward.
You have made it clear publicly and quasi-privately [Koch call] that you
have no intention to negotiate with Wisconsin. All Wisconsinites need
to be allowed to sit at the table to solve our problems, and this is
accomplished by allowing all Representatives to participate meaningfully
in the Legislature. Republican representatives currently speak for 57%
of Wisconsin. Those 57% -definitely- deserve to be represented. So do
the other 43%. It is demeaning to expect the 43% to rubber stamp your
agenda.
While it is true that we need to get our financial situation in order,
and I won't dismiss that some concessions could be made for the
betterment of Wisconsin, dignity cannot be retained using the partisan
political tricks you are playing.
I hear that you have received an open records request for your email.
I'll be looking for my email in the open records request.
If you believe in transparent Government, whether you agree or disagree with Walker's agenda for Wisconsin, you should let your voice be heard.
The Governor has claimed overwhelming support for this proposals by way of his email account. An open records request for his emails to verify these claims have been ignored. A lawsuit has been filed.
http://www.thedailypage.com/media/2011/03/04/Isthmus%20AP%20lawsuit%20press%20release%20030411.pdf
I suggest you voice your support for transparent Government by including a statement in your email. Here is what I included in mine.
"I hear that you have received an open records request for your email. I'll be looking for my email in the open records request."
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Opposition to Senate Bill 11
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 09:38:11 -0600
From: xxxxxxxxxxxx <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: govgeneral@wisconsin.gov
CC: Sen.risser@legis.wisconsin.gov, Rep.Hulsey@legis.wisconsin.gov
Governor-
[cc, my Representatives]
I am opposed to your elimination of collective bargaining as 'the' fix
to cover deficits.
I understand your argument that eliminating collective bargaining is a
timesaver. But eliminating collective bargaining doesn't fix budget
issues. Public workers are, in general, compensated less than private
workers. You are asking all public workers to take a ~10%+ pay cut.
Governor, call it what it is, a mandated ~10%+ pay cut for educators and
a slew of other professions that serve to move Wisconsin Forward.
You have made it clear publicly and quasi-privately [Koch call] that you
have no intention to negotiate with Wisconsin. All Wisconsinites need
to be allowed to sit at the table to solve our problems, and this is
accomplished by allowing all Representatives to participate meaningfully
in the Legislature. Republican representatives currently speak for 57%
of Wisconsin. Those 57% -definitely- deserve to be represented. So do
the other 43%. It is demeaning to expect the 43% to rubber stamp your
agenda.
While it is true that we need to get our financial situation in order,
and I won't dismiss that some concessions could be made for the
betterment of Wisconsin, dignity cannot be retained using the partisan
political tricks you are playing.
I hear that you have received an open records request for your email.
I'll be looking for my email in the open records request.
Thursday, March 3, 2011
Dear Scott
You have motivated me to think about politics more in the last 3 weeks than I have in my entire life. Thanks. You have made me realize the importance of bipartisanship. I mean, -real- bipartisanship, not the fake stuff I see in Washington, and certainly not the non existent "I don't negotiate on anything" kind of BS you have brought to Our House. Dale Schultz said it best on March 2, we are all in this together. Unless you have a spaceship?
I get it. There is a big hole in the budget. It isn't a simple problem at all. Maybe jacking up the perceived tax on public workers over 200% isn't equitable? Can we maybe talk about it? Is there some grand reason why the Democrats, who represent 43% to 46% of the state, shouldn't have a say? Are you really that angry of a person, or did you not read your job description very well before applying?
When you waltz in and create a $150M tax cut for business then claim you must strip $150M from state workers and remove collective bargaining because "We're broke", you sound like an idiot, or you make us to be complete idiots. I think you have figured out in the last week, we're not idiots. Perhaps you should have waited for your $150M tax cut.
I agree with you; you have to spend money to make money. This is a central argument for the UW-Madison quasi-privatization. But the difference here is that UW-Madison isn't going anywhere and is going to bring money into Wisconsin. Seems like corporations nowadays are all about seeing how fast they can send money out of the state or country. Regarding your budget cuts capitol gains taxes for profits reinvested in Wisconsin. Allow me to congratulate you, that's actually not a terrible idea, assuming you didn't ridden it with loopholes. Call me an eternal optimist.
Perhaps you missed the note about the huge amount of manufacturing jobs that have left the state. For better or worse, we are now in a knowledge economy. Maybe instead of praying for manufacturing to stick, we should get into R&D? Nope, let's cut funding to higher ed instead.
Since we're talking about the UW, you probably notice how the Chancellor uses this opportunity to discuss all of the good things that can come out of change? You just seem to sit around and repeat all you know how to say. "We're broke, state workers are overpaid, unions are greedy, I'm not negotiating, I'm doing this for the children, we are ready to take on the liberals in Madison.". You are not inspiring Wisconsin.
I have a suggestion. How about shooting a little sunshine out the ass once in a while? I'm honestly curious. Are you trying to promote a better Wisconsin, or are you just putting us on a demon war hell ride? Because it sounds much like the latter.
I have a feeling that Ronald Reagan would not friend you on Facebook, nor would like he 'like' your comments. I'm not too sure that he would consider you to be "one of him", as you like to speak of yourself and "your" supporters. Except, of course, Dale Schultz, who shows signs of independent thought. I suppose this is why he is not one of "you".
Even Reagan recognized when taxes had to be raised. PS, tax rates on the rich are not 70% right now. Maybe you could have asked them to chip in 10% on the $3.6B deficit? Honestly, I don't think the Cayman Islands would have missed it. I don't think the Koch brothers need a tax break to create jobs in Wisconsin if they wanted to. They have quite a bit of coin already.
Scott, there is no end game to this current standoff that ends up with us all winning, and the way I see it, it's all your fault. You were elected to be the leader of Wisconsin and so far you have been a divider, a Debbie Downer who could have used the opportunity to get our great state back in order in a bipartisan fashion, a triumphant return of Conservatism after Doyle's lackluster job.
A 'no' man is no better than a 'yes' man. You have instead turned the Capitol into a political cagematch circus because of the way you and yours have acted on Senate Bill 11. PS, thanks for having the Capitol closed for 3+ days now despite a court order. Keep going and your actions will likely lead to a civil protest outside Madison that will dwarf the Vietnam War protests. Even Dale Schultz thinks so. I suppose you'll think this means you're doing a great job at representing the people.
Please stop it with the sweeping legislation with no debate. You are needlessly polarizing and destroying Wisconsin while doing so. Again, I'd like to take this opportunity to congratulate you for kicking people out of the Capitol and Gallery who disagree with you, especially during your budget speech. It's clear that in addition to ignoring discourse from your fellow Democratic politicians, you also don't intend to engage the public in discourse. That's OK, we will bring it to you, with civility. I hate to tell you, there is no such thing as a media blackout in 2011. Thank Jeebus for the internet.
What a legacy! You could have avoided all of this by simply doing your job and representing us all, and by showing even an iota of bipartisanship.
If I woke up tomorrow and the news said that you had a come to Jesus moment and were actually willing to participate in a Bipartisan Government [hint, the state is at -most- 57% Republican], I think I'd still fight to make sure you spend as little time in office as possible because you simply cannot be trusted.
While I find the specifics of your budget to be troublesome, how you carry yourself and represent Wisconsin is the real problem here. Your refusal to compromise or negotiate is an embarrassment to democracy and all of the Democratic and Republican Governors that have come before you in the the great State of Wisconsin.
Notice I didn't even bring up the Koch call?
Sorry Scott, just had to get this all off my chest. I just don't understand you at all.
- An outside agitator from Madison, Wisconsin.
If you made it this far, you might enjoy;
http://www.progressive.org/rc030211.html
http://wisconsininsider.typepad.com/news-from-inside-the-wisc/
[edit 3/2/2011 9:22am to fix a grammar issue]
I get it. There is a big hole in the budget. It isn't a simple problem at all. Maybe jacking up the perceived tax on public workers over 200% isn't equitable? Can we maybe talk about it? Is there some grand reason why the Democrats, who represent 43% to 46% of the state, shouldn't have a say? Are you really that angry of a person, or did you not read your job description very well before applying?
When you waltz in and create a $150M tax cut for business then claim you must strip $150M from state workers and remove collective bargaining because "We're broke", you sound like an idiot, or you make us to be complete idiots. I think you have figured out in the last week, we're not idiots. Perhaps you should have waited for your $150M tax cut.
I agree with you; you have to spend money to make money. This is a central argument for the UW-Madison quasi-privatization. But the difference here is that UW-Madison isn't going anywhere and is going to bring money into Wisconsin. Seems like corporations nowadays are all about seeing how fast they can send money out of the state or country. Regarding your budget cuts capitol gains taxes for profits reinvested in Wisconsin. Allow me to congratulate you, that's actually not a terrible idea, assuming you didn't ridden it with loopholes. Call me an eternal optimist.
Perhaps you missed the note about the huge amount of manufacturing jobs that have left the state. For better or worse, we are now in a knowledge economy. Maybe instead of praying for manufacturing to stick, we should get into R&D? Nope, let's cut funding to higher ed instead.
Since we're talking about the UW, you probably notice how the Chancellor uses this opportunity to discuss all of the good things that can come out of change? You just seem to sit around and repeat all you know how to say. "We're broke, state workers are overpaid, unions are greedy, I'm not negotiating, I'm doing this for the children, we are ready to take on the liberals in Madison.". You are not inspiring Wisconsin.
I have a suggestion. How about shooting a little sunshine out the ass once in a while? I'm honestly curious. Are you trying to promote a better Wisconsin, or are you just putting us on a demon war hell ride? Because it sounds much like the latter.
I have a feeling that Ronald Reagan would not friend you on Facebook, nor would like he 'like' your comments. I'm not too sure that he would consider you to be "one of him", as you like to speak of yourself and "your" supporters. Except, of course, Dale Schultz, who shows signs of independent thought. I suppose this is why he is not one of "you".
Even Reagan recognized when taxes had to be raised. PS, tax rates on the rich are not 70% right now. Maybe you could have asked them to chip in 10% on the $3.6B deficit? Honestly, I don't think the Cayman Islands would have missed it. I don't think the Koch brothers need a tax break to create jobs in Wisconsin if they wanted to. They have quite a bit of coin already.
Scott, there is no end game to this current standoff that ends up with us all winning, and the way I see it, it's all your fault. You were elected to be the leader of Wisconsin and so far you have been a divider, a Debbie Downer who could have used the opportunity to get our great state back in order in a bipartisan fashion, a triumphant return of Conservatism after Doyle's lackluster job.
A 'no' man is no better than a 'yes' man. You have instead turned the Capitol into a political cagematch circus because of the way you and yours have acted on Senate Bill 11. PS, thanks for having the Capitol closed for 3+ days now despite a court order. Keep going and your actions will likely lead to a civil protest outside Madison that will dwarf the Vietnam War protests. Even Dale Schultz thinks so. I suppose you'll think this means you're doing a great job at representing the people.
Please stop it with the sweeping legislation with no debate. You are needlessly polarizing and destroying Wisconsin while doing so. Again, I'd like to take this opportunity to congratulate you for kicking people out of the Capitol and Gallery who disagree with you, especially during your budget speech. It's clear that in addition to ignoring discourse from your fellow Democratic politicians, you also don't intend to engage the public in discourse. That's OK, we will bring it to you, with civility. I hate to tell you, there is no such thing as a media blackout in 2011. Thank Jeebus for the internet.
What a legacy! You could have avoided all of this by simply doing your job and representing us all, and by showing even an iota of bipartisanship.
If I woke up tomorrow and the news said that you had a come to Jesus moment and were actually willing to participate in a Bipartisan Government [hint, the state is at -most- 57% Republican], I think I'd still fight to make sure you spend as little time in office as possible because you simply cannot be trusted.
While I find the specifics of your budget to be troublesome, how you carry yourself and represent Wisconsin is the real problem here. Your refusal to compromise or negotiate is an embarrassment to democracy and all of the Democratic and Republican Governors that have come before you in the the great State of Wisconsin.
Notice I didn't even bring up the Koch call?
Sorry Scott, just had to get this all off my chest. I just don't understand you at all.
- An outside agitator from Madison, Wisconsin.
If you made it this far, you might enjoy;
http://www.progressive.org/rc030211.html
http://wisconsininsider.typepad.com/news-from-inside-the-wisc/
[edit 3/2/2011 9:22am to fix a grammar issue]
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
An attempted minority takeover in Wisconsin's Capitol
Walker and our Republican representatives, you were voted in by 52% of the public. 19 of 33 senators are Republican [57%]. 57 of 99 assemblyman are Republican [57%].
57% of Wisconsin believes a Conservative agenda is the right way to go with Wisconsin. We all get that. I don't even have a problem with that.
The problem is, you are not a Conservative, you are a Tea Party extremist Today is your big day, when you announce a budget you didn't campaign on, a budget to essentially end investements in education and Government services in Wisconsin.
Depending on what polls you believe, anywhere from 17% to 27% of Americans consider themselves Tea Party members. You are representing an extreme viewpoint that a minority of Americans believe in, yet you have put yourself into an idealogue and autocrat position that the people of Wisconsin are behind you. How popular will you be once the dust settles over your budget? When only the Tea Party and a few confused Republicans are left to defend how far you've gone, will you still refuse to compromise?
I agree with you on the following parts of the Contract For America.
# Identify constitutionality of every new law
# Demand a balanced federal budget
# Simplify the tax system
# Audit federal government agencies for waste and constitutionality
# Limit annual growth in federal spending
# Pass an 'All-of-the-Above' Energy Policy
# Reduce Earmarks
I don't agree with you on
# Reject emissions trading
# Repeal the healthcare legislation passed on March 23, 2010
# Reduce Taxes
Reduced taxes will come hand in hand with a balanced budget and reduced waste.
Funny, no where in that Contract do I read
# Break the middle class for tax reductions only for Corporations
# Eliminate investments in education and the future of our state
# Reject democracy and the majority will of the people.
There were 100,000+ people in Madison this week because you are not representing the majority of Wisconsin. You are, at best, representing less than 1/3rd of the people. 1/3rd of the people shouldn't have 100% of the say.
You have convinced many of our respectable, elected Republican officials that they should support the extreme agenda of the Tea Party, a group that has the support of less than a 1/3rd of Americans, and reject any compromise. You have convinced them that intelligent debate or negotiation of this bill is not needed.
You have publically dismissed our representatives that do not agree with your idealogue as people that are "not one of us". Who in the HELL is this "US" you are talking about Scott Walker? I think all of Wisconsin would like to know, so we better understand exactly who's agenda you are pushing.
Really, we're not asking for a lot, we're just asking for Democracy, which strangely I wouldn't think I'd have to fight for inside MY OWN COUNTRY. Yet that is what I feel like I have been doing every time I have been to the square for the last 13 or so days.
We are Wisconsin. We are all "US". Who are you?
On my way out of town on Sunday, I saw a sign at the Amoco on station on East Washington, obviously left behind by a protester. "No Compromise, No Democracy. Know Compromise, Know Democracy". It's true, if we cannot peacefully come together to solve this problem, there will be No Democracy, and you refuse to join the people of Wisconsin. You are a divider.
Yesterday you decided to lock us out of our Capitol. I hear that you setup metal detectors as well. Just in case you forgot, or couldn't hear the many protesters below your window Governor, this is OUR house. WE are all Wisconsin, not YOU.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/01/us/01wisconsin.html
Scott, drop your ego and meet the people of Wisconsin somewhat near the middle. You are supposed to represent all of Wisconsin's best interests. Given your viewpoints and minority you represent, you are probably entitled to about a 40% compromise, but I think you'd be amazed how receptive the people of Wisconsin are to a 60% solution.
57% of Wisconsin believes a Conservative agenda is the right way to go with Wisconsin. We all get that. I don't even have a problem with that.
The problem is, you are not a Conservative, you are a Tea Party extremist Today is your big day, when you announce a budget you didn't campaign on, a budget to essentially end investements in education and Government services in Wisconsin.
Depending on what polls you believe, anywhere from 17% to 27% of Americans consider themselves Tea Party members. You are representing an extreme viewpoint that a minority of Americans believe in, yet you have put yourself into an idealogue and autocrat position that the people of Wisconsin are behind you. How popular will you be once the dust settles over your budget? When only the Tea Party and a few confused Republicans are left to defend how far you've gone, will you still refuse to compromise?
I agree with you on the following parts of the Contract For America.
# Identify constitutionality of every new law
# Demand a balanced federal budget
# Simplify the tax system
# Audit federal government agencies for waste and constitutionality
# Limit annual growth in federal spending
# Pass an 'All-of-the-Above' Energy Policy
# Reduce Earmarks
I don't agree with you on
# Reject emissions trading
# Repeal the healthcare legislation passed on March 23, 2010
# Reduce Taxes
Reduced taxes will come hand in hand with a balanced budget and reduced waste.
Funny, no where in that Contract do I read
# Break the middle class for tax reductions only for Corporations
# Eliminate investments in education and the future of our state
# Reject democracy and the majority will of the people.
There were 100,000+ people in Madison this week because you are not representing the majority of Wisconsin. You are, at best, representing less than 1/3rd of the people. 1/3rd of the people shouldn't have 100% of the say.
You have convinced many of our respectable, elected Republican officials that they should support the extreme agenda of the Tea Party, a group that has the support of less than a 1/3rd of Americans, and reject any compromise. You have convinced them that intelligent debate or negotiation of this bill is not needed.
You have publically dismissed our representatives that do not agree with your idealogue as people that are "not one of us". Who in the HELL is this "US" you are talking about Scott Walker? I think all of Wisconsin would like to know, so we better understand exactly who's agenda you are pushing.
Really, we're not asking for a lot, we're just asking for Democracy, which strangely I wouldn't think I'd have to fight for inside MY OWN COUNTRY. Yet that is what I feel like I have been doing every time I have been to the square for the last 13 or so days.
We are Wisconsin. We are all "US". Who are you?
On my way out of town on Sunday, I saw a sign at the Amoco on station on East Washington, obviously left behind by a protester. "No Compromise, No Democracy. Know Compromise, Know Democracy". It's true, if we cannot peacefully come together to solve this problem, there will be No Democracy, and you refuse to join the people of Wisconsin. You are a divider.
Yesterday you decided to lock us out of our Capitol. I hear that you setup metal detectors as well. Just in case you forgot, or couldn't hear the many protesters below your window Governor, this is OUR house. WE are all Wisconsin, not YOU.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/01/us/01wisconsin.html
Scott, drop your ego and meet the people of Wisconsin somewhat near the middle. You are supposed to represent all of Wisconsin's best interests. Given your viewpoints and minority you represent, you are probably entitled to about a 40% compromise, but I think you'd be amazed how receptive the people of Wisconsin are to a 60% solution.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)